Are the signals earning trust?

Performance

Daily results →
Cohort
Period
Market
All
⚾ Batter
Direction
Filtered to MarketSP Strikeouts
Signal check
Strongest

SP Strikeouts is the strongest edge on this slate — +11.4 pts over its own base rate across 932 graded predictions.

Trend

Overall hit rate is 57.6%, +11.4 pts over baseline.

Performance summary

Hit rate
57.6%
537–395 record
vs baseline
+11.4 pts
vs 46% base
Graded
932
58 slates
Last 90 days · All qualifying · 27 void · 0 pending · avg score 86

The model is showing meaningful predictive signal over this period — +11.4 pts over baseline on 932 graded predictions, with the strongest separation in SP Strikeouts.

All qualifying537–39557.6%n=932
Featured77–4364.2%n=120
Other qualifying460–35256.7%n=812

What's working

Every market ranked by the edge it holds over the rate its own event happens without us — not by how often it converts. The tables further down read served predictions only, so the “all” figure beside each edge is the check that a market which never clears the floor is not mistaken for one that does not work.

Marketranked by edgeEdge vs baseserved · all predictionsHit rateservedNservedShare servedcleared 70+
SP Strikeouts+11.4 ptsall +9.0 pts · n=1,17357.6% base 46%932
Edge is the served props’ hit rate minus the rate that event happens on its own; “all” is the same figure over everything the market predicted, floor or not. “Starved” means the market beats its base rate by 5+ points across everything it predicted, yet under a tenth of those ever clear the floor — the scale cannot reach, so the edge is never offered. Judged on the engine running today: a superseded scorer’s serving share is not a fact about the current one.

Trust board

The page’s verdict, from edge over baseline, sample size and recent trend together — never from hit rate alone. A tier with nothing in it is not shown.

Strong signal
Beats its own base rate by 10+ points on a real sample.
  • SP Strikeouts+11.4 pts n=932
The evidence

Score calibration

The scoring system is worth having only if a higher score means a better outcome. Each band is measured against the base rate of the props it actually holds — the top band is almost purely 1+ hit, so a raw-rate reading of this table would credit it for carrying a common event.

Score is directionally useful, but not perfectly monotonic — 99–100 runs +15.8 pts above 70–74 over base, with 2 of 5 steps going the wrong way.

Predictions scored 90+ outperform everything below them by 10.0 pts over base (n=409).

The 80–84 band remains small; read it as an observation, not a rate.

Current scoring engine only — 258 predictions from superseded versions excluded. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not; per-version records are in the model table below.

70–7457.2%n=180
75–7969.6%n=46
80–8460.0%n=5
85–8927.0%n=37
90–9450.6%n=83
95–9862.9%n=151
99–10058.3%n=175
Observed hit rateBase rate for that band’s props — the gap is the edge
Score bandRecordHit rateSampleVoidsvs base
70–74103–7757.2%n=1807+6.6 pts base 51%
75–7932–1469.6%n=461+5.7 pts base 64%
80–84Small sample3–260.0%n=50+15.0 pts base 45%
85–8910–2727.0%n=370+0.9 pts base 26%
90–9442–4150.6%n=833+10.3 pts base 40%
95–9895–5662.9%n=1516+10.7 pts base 52%
99–100102–7358.3%n=1757+22.4 pts base 36%

Where the model has edge

Segments by market, ranked by lift over their own base rate. Anything under the minimum sample is separated and labelled rather than ranked alongside — a high percentage on twenty predictions is not a discovered edge.

Segmentvs baseHit rateNRecordvs prior period
Reliable edgesn ≥ 30 graded
SP Strikeouts+11.4 pts base 46%57.6%n=932537–395no prior period

Over vs Under

Over signals are outperforming Under by 7.4 points of lift (+15.7 pts against +8.3 pts).

Over195–19749.7%+15.7 pts vs basen=392
Under342–19863.3%+8.3 pts vs basen=540
MarketOverrate · pts vs baseUnderrate · pts vs base
SP Strikeouts49.7% +15.7n=39263.3% +8.3n=540
Deeper diagnostics

Consistency

Performance spans 53%–61% across these windows, with Last 30 4.7 points weaker than all time.

Last 7
85.7%
12–2 n=14
+32.8 pts vs Last 30
Last 30
52.9%
156–139 n=295
-8.1 pts vs Prev 30
Prev 30
60.9%
298–191 n=489
—
Season
57.6%
537–395 n=932
—
All time
57.6%
537–395 n=932
—

Market pulse

Each market’s recent slates against its own period average. The trend column is the row’s answer; the grid behind it fades with age.

MarketPeriodTrendOct6Oct5Oct4Oct3Sep30Sep27Sep26Sep25
SP Strikeouts58%n=932building sample100%n=375%n=450%n=2100%n=529%n=764%n=1440%n=1545%n=20
Above own averageNear own averageBelow own averageOlder slates fade; faded cells also have fewer than 5 decisions

By month

Lift over base, 2026-08 → 2026-10
MonthRecordHit ratevs base
2026-08273–19558.3% n=468+11.3 pts base 47%
2026-09252–19856.0% n=450+10.5 pts base 45%
2026-1012–285.7% n=14+41.9 pts base 44%

Model version performance

0 of 1 current model versions are outperforming the versions they replaced; MLB SP Strikeouts is behind.

VersionActiveRecordHit ratevs basevs previous version
MLB SP Strikeouts
sp-v42026-08-21→2026-10-06387–29057.2% n=677+11.7 pts base 45%-3.6 pts behind sp-v3
3 earlier versions2026-08-03→2026-08-20150–10558.8% n=255+10.4 pts base 48%

Methodology

Edge over baseline, never a raw hit rate
Every “vs base” figure is the observed hit rate minus how often that exact prop’s event happens on its own, for the population that could plausibly have been offered it. A batter getting 1+ hit happens ~61% of the time unprompted; a starter striking out 8+ happens ~13% of the time. Against one shared average the rare-event markets look bad no matter how well they are picked.
Opportunity Score is a ranking signal, not a probability
70 is the publication floor. A 93 is not “93% likely” — it is an estimate of edge over the market’s own base rate. Observed hit rates on this page are outcomes, not forecasts.
Sample size is a headline, not a footnote
Under 30 graded predictions a segment is separated and marked rather than ranked. Predictions inside one slate are correlated, so a run of good days is less independent evidence than its count suggests.
Cohorts
All qualifying is every published prediction scoring 70+. Featured is the eight carried on Today. Other qualifying is the remainder — the split exists to check that ranking, not just scoring, is doing something.
Calibration reads the current engine only
A superseded scorer’s calibration is not a fact about the one running today. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not. Per-version records stay in the model table above.
What is not here
No odds are consumed anywhere on this page. Total bases and batter walks are excluded — both were retired for being unservable rather than for being wrong. Voids and pending predictions are excluded from every hit rate.