Are the signals earning trust?
Performance
Market
βΎ Batter
βΎ Pitcher
Assists carries the strongest edge (+23.2 pts over base). Batter Hits is the volume leader (5,938 graded, -3.6 pts). Over is currently the stronger side (+17.7 pts vs -23.0 pts for Under).
What's working
Every market's measured edge against how much of it we actually serve, ranked by lift. The tables further down read served predictions only, so a market that is good but never clears the floor is invisible there β and looks the same as one that does not work.
MarketAll predictionsServed (70+)Share served
Assists+23.2 pp n=269+33.0 pp n=15959%
Rebounds+18.3 pp n=322+32.1 pp n=17655%
Batter Ks+16.6 pp n=138+28.2 pp n=1410%
Points+8.8 pp n=449+22.6 pp n=25056%
SP Strikeouts+7.9 pp n=530+11.0 pp n=40476%
SP Hits Allowed-3.1 pp n=530-0.6 pp n=32161%
Batter Hits-3.6 pp n=5,938+2.7 pp n=1,48525%
βStarvedβ means the market beats its base rate by 5+ points across everything it predicted, yet under a tenth of those ever clear the floor β the scale cannot reach, so the edge is never offered.
2026 season Β· Featured128β6965.0%n=197
All qualifying1730β107961.6%n=2809
Featured128β6965.0%n=197
Other qualifying1602β101061.3%n=2612
Deeper diagnostics
Market pulse
Recent slate hit rates compared with each marketβs own average. The right edge shows the selected period and the latest three slates versus the prior three.
MarketPeriodAug28Aug27Aug26Aug25Aug24Aug23Aug22Aug21
βΎBatter Hits63%n=122building sampleββββββββ
βΎSP Strikeouts62%n=16building sampleββ100%n=4βββ50%n=450%n=6
βΎSP Hits Allowed62%n=8building sampleββ100%n=1βββ67%n=350%n=2
πPoints79%n=14building sample100%n=2100%n=1ββ0%n=3100%n=3ββ
πRebounds47%n=19building sample67%n=333%n=350%n=233%n=3100%n=30%n=2ββ
πAssists89%n=18building sample100%n=375%n=4100%n=1100%n=450%n=2100%n=3ββ
Above own averageNear own averageBelow own averageFaded cells have fewer than 5 decisions
Does a higher score perform better?
Not enough graded props yet to judge whether higher scores perform better.
Current scoring engine only β 152 predictions from superseded versions excluded. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not; per-version records are in the model table below.
Score bandRecordHit rateSampleVoidsvs base
99β10042β2067.7%n=623+42.7 pp base 25%
Over vs Under
Over126β6566.0%n=191
Under2β433.3%n=6
Difference: +32.6 pp Β· Over stronger
MarketOverUnder
Batter Hits63.1% n=122Not graded n=0
SP Strikeouts69.2% n=1333.3% n=3
SP Hits Allowed80.0% n=533.3% n=3
Points78.6% n=14Not graded n=0
Rebounds47.4% n=19Not graded n=0
Assists88.9% n=18Not graded n=0
Edge finder
SegmentHit ratevs baseRecord30-day trend
Batter Hits63.1% n=122+2.5 pp base 61%77β4563% 30d
Below minimum sample
ReboundsSmall47.4% n=19+26.1 pp base 21%9β1047% 30d
AssistsSmall88.9% n=18+65.7 pp base 23%16β289% 30d
SP StrikeoutsSmall62.5% n=16+25.3 pp base 37%10β662% 30d
PointsSmall78.6% n=14+49.4 pp base 29%11β379% 30d
SP Hits AllowedSmall62.5% n=8+20.0 pp base 43%5β362% 30d
Consistency
Last 7
70.4%
38β16 n=54
Last 30
64.3%
110β61 n=171
Prev 30
69.2%
18β8 n=26
Season
65.0%
128β69 n=197
All time
65.0%
128β69 n=197
By month
MonthRecordHit ratevs base
2026-0718β869.2% n=26+16.1 pp base 53%
2026-08110β6164.3% n=171+16.6 pp base 48%
Model versions
VersionActiveRecordHit ratevs base
MLB Batter Hits
4 earlier versions2026-07-05β2026-08-2077β4563.1% n=122+2.5 pp base 61%
WNBA Rebounds
wnba-pra-v42026-08-23β2026-08-288β850.0% n=16+29.7 pp base 20%
2 earlier versions2026-07-15β2026-08-201β233.3% n=3+7.8 pp base 26%
WNBA Assists
wnba-pra-v42026-08-23β2026-08-2815β288.2% n=17+69.8 pp base 18%
1 earlier version2026-07-15β2026-07-161β0100.0% n=1+56.6 pp base 43%
MLB SP Strikeouts
sp-v42026-08-21β2026-08-269β564.3% n=14+28.0 pp base 36%
2 earlier versions2026-08-10β2026-08-111β150.0% n=2+6.2 pp base 44%
WNBA Points
wnba-pra-v42026-08-23β2026-08-286β366.7% n=9+45.9 pp base 21%
1 earlier version2026-07-15β2026-07-155β0100.0% n=5+55.8 pp base 44%
MLB SP Hits Allowed
sp-v42026-08-21β2026-08-264β266.7% n=6+31.1 pp base 36%
1 earlier version2026-08-10β2026-08-101β150.0% n=2-13.3 pp base 63%
All qualifying includes every published prediction scoring 70+. Featured is the main-page eight. Observed hit rates are not probabilities; prediction counts are correlated within the displayed slate count.