Are the signals earning trust?

Performance

Daily results →
Cohort
Period
Market
All
⚾ Batter
Direction
Filtered to CohortOther qualifyingMarketBatter HitsDirectionOver
Signal check
Strongest

Batter Hits is the strongest edge on this slate — +4.5 pts over its own base rate across 988 graded predictions.

Trend

Overall hit rate is 65.1%, +4.6 pts over baseline — down 0.8 points on the previous 30 days, which ran +5.4 pts.

Performance summary

Hit rate
65.1%
639–342 record
vs baseline
+4.6 pts
vs 61% base
Graded
981
25 slates
Last 30 days · Other qualifying · previous 30 days: 66.0% (+5.4 pts over base) -0.8 pts · 79 void · 0 pending · avg score 75

The model is modestly ahead of baseline over this period (+4.6 pts on 981 graded predictions).

All qualifying643–34565.1%n=988
Featured4–357.1%n=7
Other qualifying639–34265.1%n=981

What's working

Every market ranked by the edge it holds over the rate its own event happens without us — not by how often it converts. The tables further down read served predictions only, so the “all” figure beside each edge is the check that a market which never clears the floor is not mistaken for one that does not work.

Marketranked by edgeEdge vs baseserved · all predictionsHit rateservedNservedShare servedcleared 70+
Batter Hits+4.5 ptsall -5.1 pts · n=5,01565.1% base 61%988
Edge is the served props’ hit rate minus the rate that event happens on its own; “all” is the same figure over everything the market predicted, floor or not. “Starved” means the market beats its base rate by 5+ points across everything it predicted, yet under a tenth of those ever clear the floor — the scale cannot reach, so the edge is never offered. Judged on the engine running today: a superseded scorer’s serving share is not a fact about the current one.

Trust board

The page’s verdict, from edge over baseline, sample size and recent trend together — never from hit rate alone. A tier with nothing in it is not shown.

Watch
No measured edge either way — or an edge that has fallen sharply.
  • Batter Hits+4.5 pts n=988
The evidence

Score calibration

The scoring system is worth having only if a higher score means a better outcome. Each band is measured against the base rate of the props it actually holds — the top band is almost purely 1+ hit, so a raw-rate reading of this table would credit it for carrying a common event.

Score is not separating outcomes in this sample — the top and bottom bands are within 2.3 points of each other over base.

The 85–89 and 90–94 bands remain small; read them as an observation, not a rate.

70–7465.4%n=529
75–7966.7%n=303
80–8463.1%n=122
85–8953.8%n=26
90–940.0%n=1
Observed hit rateBase rate for that band’s props — the gap is the edge
Score bandRecordHit rateSampleVoidsvs base
70–74346–18365.4%n=52949+4.8 pts base 61%
75–79202–10166.7%n=30321+6.1 pts base 61%
80–8477–4563.1%n=1229+2.5 pts base 61%
85–89Small sample14–1253.8%n=260-6.7 pts base 61%
90–94Small sample0–10.0%n=10-60.6 pts base 61%

Where the model has edge

Segments by market, ranked by lift over their own base rate. Anything under the minimum sample is separated and labelled rather than ranked alongside — a high percentage on twenty predictions is not a discovered edge.

Segmentvs baseHit rateNRecordvs prior period
Reliable edgesn ≥ 30 graded
Batter Hits+4.6 pts base 61%65.1%n=981639–342→ -0.8 from 66%

Over vs Under

Only Over predictions were served in this selection (+4.6 pts over base, n=981), so the two sides cannot be compared.

Over639–34265.1%+4.6 pts vs basen=981
Under0–0Not gradedn=0
MarketOverrate · pts vs baseUnderrate · pts vs base
Batter Hits65.1% +4.6n=981—
Deeper diagnostics

Consistency

Performance spans 51%–66% across these windows, with Last 7 13.8 points weaker than all time.

Last 7
51.0%
26–25 n=51
-14.2 pts vs Last 30
Last 30
65.1%
639–342 n=981
-0.8 pts vs Prev 30
Prev 30
66.0%
900–464 n=1,364
—
Season
64.7%
1962–1069 n=3,031
—
All time
64.7%
1962–1069 n=3,031
—

Market pulse

Each market’s recent slates against its own period average. The trend column is the row’s answer; the grid behind it fades with age.

MarketPeriodTrendOct7Oct6Oct5Oct4Oct3Oct1Sep30Sep27
Batter Hits65%n=981↑ +32vs prior 364%n=1150%n=478%n=944%n=933%n=1820%n=562%n=2162%n=39
Above own averageNear own averageBelow own averageOlder slates fade; faded cells also have fewer than 5 decisions

By month

Lift over base, 2026-07 → 2026-10
MonthRecordHit ratevs base
2026-07106–6163.5% n=167+2.9 pts base 61%
2026-08870–48664.2% n=1,356+3.6 pts base 61%
2026-09959–49366.0% n=1,452+5.5 pts base 61%
2026-1027–2948.2% n=56-12.4 pts base 61%

Model version performance

0 of 1 current model versions are outperforming the versions they replaced; MLB Batter Hits is behind.

VersionActiveRecordHit ratevs basevs previous version
MLB Batter Hits
batter-hit-v62026-08-21→2026-10-071341–70765.5% n=2,048+4.9 pts base 61%-1.2 pts behind batter-hit-v5
4 earlier versions2026-07-05→2026-08-20621–36263.2% n=983+2.6 pts base 61%

Methodology

Edge over baseline, never a raw hit rate
Every “vs base” figure is the observed hit rate minus how often that exact prop’s event happens on its own, for the population that could plausibly have been offered it. A batter getting 1+ hit happens ~61% of the time unprompted; a starter striking out 8+ happens ~13% of the time. Against one shared average the rare-event markets look bad no matter how well they are picked.
Opportunity Score is a ranking signal, not a probability
70 is the publication floor. A 93 is not “93% likely” — it is an estimate of edge over the market’s own base rate. Observed hit rates on this page are outcomes, not forecasts.
Sample size is a headline, not a footnote
Under 30 graded predictions a segment is separated and marked rather than ranked. Predictions inside one slate are correlated, so a run of good days is less independent evidence than its count suggests.
Cohorts
All qualifying is every published prediction scoring 70+. Featured is the eight carried on Today. Other qualifying is the remainder — the split exists to check that ranking, not just scoring, is doing something.
Calibration reads the current engine only
A superseded scorer’s calibration is not a fact about the one running today. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not. Per-version records stay in the model table above.
What is not here
No odds are consumed anywhere on this page. Total bases and batter walks are excluded — both were retired for being unservable rather than for being wrong. Voids and pending predictions are excluded from every hit rate.