Are the signals earning trust?

Performance

Daily results →
Cohort
Period
Market
All
⚾ Batter
Direction
Filtered to CohortOther qualifyingDirectionUnder
Signal check
Strongest

SP Strikeouts is the strongest edge on this slate — +8.3 pts over its own base rate across 540 graded predictions.

Weakest

SP Hits Allowed shows no measured edge either way (+0.4 pts over base, n=483).

Trend

Overall hit rate is 58.9%, +3.9 pts over baseline.

Performance summary

Hit rate
58.9%
570–398 record
vs baseline
+3.9 pts
vs 55% base
Graded
968
57 slates
2026 season · Other qualifying · 24 void · 0 pending · avg score 82

The model is modestly ahead of baseline over this period (+3.9 pts on 968 graded predictions).

All qualifying608–41559.4%n=1023
Featured38–1769.1%n=55
Other qualifying570–39858.9%n=968

What's working

Every market ranked by the edge it holds over the rate its own event happens without us — not by how often it converts. The tables further down read served predictions only, so the “all” figure beside each edge is the check that a market which never clears the floor is not mistaken for one that does not work.

Marketranked by edgeEdge vs baseserved · all predictionsHit rateservedNservedShare servedcleared 70+
SP Strikeouts+8.3 ptsall +5.6 pts · n=76563.3% base 55%540
SP Hits Allowed+0.4 ptsall -1.4 pts · n=95855.1% base 55%483
Edge is the served props’ hit rate minus the rate that event happens on its own; “all” is the same figure over everything the market predicted, floor or not. “Starved” means the market beats its base rate by 5+ points across everything it predicted, yet under a tenth of those ever clear the floor — the scale cannot reach, so the edge is never offered. Judged on the engine running today: a superseded scorer’s serving share is not a fact about the current one.

Trust board

The page’s verdict, from edge over baseline, sample size and recent trend together — never from hit rate alone. A tier with nothing in it is not shown.

Promising
A measurable edge, on a smaller sample or a smaller margin.
  • SP Strikeouts+8.3 pts n=540
Watch
No measured edge either way — or an edge that has fallen sharply.
  • SP Hits Allowed+0.4 pts n=483
The evidence

Score calibration

The scoring system is worth having only if a higher score means a better outcome. Each band is measured against the base rate of the props it actually holds — the top band is almost purely 1+ hit, so a raw-rate reading of this table would credit it for carrying a common event.

Score is directionally useful, but not perfectly monotonic — 99–100 runs +4.8 pts above 70–74 over base, with 1 of 3 steps going the wrong way.

Predictions scored 90+ outperform everything below them by 9.1 pts over base (n=222).

The 80–84, 85–89 and 90–94 bands remain small; read them as an observation, not a rate.

Current scoring engine only — 347 predictions from superseded versions excluded. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not; per-version records are in the model table below.

70–7458.4%n=154
75–7954.8%n=228
80–8450.0%n=10
85–8957.1%n=7
90–940.0%n=2
95–9866.4%n=113
99–10065.1%n=109
Observed hit rateBase rate for that band’s props — the gap is the edge
Score bandRecordHit rateSampleVoidsvs base
70–7490–6458.4%n=1546+7.7 pts base 51%
75–79125–10354.8%n=22810-0.7 pts base 56%
80–84Small sample5–550.0%n=100-3.4 pts base 53%
85–89Small sample4–357.1%n=71-2.0 pts base 59%
90–94Small sample0–20.0%n=20-47.4 pts base 47%
95–9875–3866.4%n=1135+11.1 pts base 55%
99–10071–3865.1%n=1090+12.5 pts base 53%

Where the model has edge

Segments by market, ranked by lift over their own base rate. Anything under the minimum sample is separated and labelled rather than ranked alongside — a high percentage on twenty predictions is not a discovered edge.

Segmentvs baseHit rateNRecordvs prior period
Reliable edgesn ≥ 30 graded
SP Strikeouts+7.9 pts base 55%62.9%n=510321–189no prior period
SP Hits Allowed-0.4 pts base 55%54.4%n=458249–209no prior period

Over vs Under

Only Under predictions were served in this selection (+3.9 pts over base, n=968), so the two sides cannot be compared.

Over0–0Not gradedn=0
Under570–39858.9%+3.9 pts vs basen=968
MarketOverrate · pts vs baseUnderrate · pts vs base
SP Strikeouts—62.9% +7.8n=510
SP Hits Allowed—54.4% -0.4n=458
Deeper diagnostics

Consistency

Performance has been stable around 59% across every window with a real sample.

Last 7
100.0%
4–0 n=4
+40.9 pts vs Last 30
Last 30
59.1%
159–110 n=269
-0.1 pts vs Prev 30
Prev 30
59.2%
270–186 n=456
—
Season
58.9%
570–398 n=968
—
All time
58.9%
570–398 n=968
—

Market pulse

Each market’s recent slates against its own period average. The trend column is the row’s answer; the grid behind it fades with age.

MarketPeriodTrendOct5Oct4Oct3Sep30Sep27Sep26Sep25Sep24
SP Strikeouts63%n=510building sample100%n=1—100%n=10%n=289%n=957%n=744%n=971%n=7
SP Hits Allowed54%n=458building sample—100%n=1100%n=1100%n=275%n=8100%n=350%n=8100%n=7
Above own averageNear own averageBelow own averageOlder slates fade; faded cells also have fewer than 5 decisions

By month

Lift over base, 2026-08 → 2026-10
MonthRecordHit ratevs base
2026-08323–23158.3% n=554+2.7 pts base 56%
2026-09243–16759.3% n=410+5.2 pts base 54%
2026-104–0100.0% n=4+40.6 pts base 59%

Model version performance

2 of 2 current model versions are outperforming the versions they replaced.

VersionActiveRecordHit ratevs basevs previous version
MLB SP Strikeouts
sp-v42026-08-21→2026-10-05213–12363.4% n=336+9.2 pts base 54%+3.9 pts better than sp-v3
3 earlier versions2026-08-03→2026-08-20108–6662.1% n=174+5.3 pts base 57%
MLB SP Hits Allowed
sp-v42026-08-21→2026-10-04157–13054.7% n=287+1.4 pts base 53%+11.9 pts better than sp-v3
3 earlier versions2026-08-03→2026-08-2092–7953.8% n=171-3.5 pts base 57%

Methodology

Edge over baseline, never a raw hit rate
Every “vs base” figure is the observed hit rate minus how often that exact prop’s event happens on its own, for the population that could plausibly have been offered it. A batter getting 1+ hit happens ~61% of the time unprompted; a starter striking out 8+ happens ~13% of the time. Against one shared average the rare-event markets look bad no matter how well they are picked.
Opportunity Score is a ranking signal, not a probability
70 is the publication floor. A 93 is not “93% likely” — it is an estimate of edge over the market’s own base rate. Observed hit rates on this page are outcomes, not forecasts.
Sample size is a headline, not a footnote
Under 30 graded predictions a segment is separated and marked rather than ranked. Predictions inside one slate are correlated, so a run of good days is less independent evidence than its count suggests.
Cohorts
All qualifying is every published prediction scoring 70+. Featured is the eight carried on Today. Other qualifying is the remainder — the split exists to check that ranking, not just scoring, is doing something.
Calibration reads the current engine only
A superseded scorer’s calibration is not a fact about the one running today. Pooling engines once made the top band look anti-predictive when it was not. Per-version records stay in the model table above.
What is not here
No odds are consumed anywhere on this page. Total bases and batter walks are excluded — both were retired for being unservable rather than for being wrong. Voids and pending predictions are excluded from every hit rate.